An analysis of the basic idea behind the schlieffen plan

Schlieffen considered other possibilities inusing war games to model a Russian invasion of east Germany against a smaller German army. Military Decision Making and the Disasters of Ithaca: These views no doubt influenced Schlieffen, and as stated above, he responded to the situation with a different strategic plan to Moltke.

A transfer of the 7th Army to the right flank was studied but the prospect of a decisive battle in Lorraine became more attractive. The debate provided the German army with a fairly familiar alternative to Vernichtungsstrategie, after the opening campaigns of The exact records of when and on what occasions Schlieffen deemed it necessary to become active behind the scenes and how he proceeded were lost when the German Army Archive at Potsdam was destroyed during an Allied bombing raid in the closing days of World War II.

Scharnhorst intended them to "support incompetent Generals, providing the talents that might otherwise be wanting among leaders and commanders". They saw the longer war against the improvised armies of the French republic, the indecisive battles of the winter of — and the Kleinkrieg against Francs-tireurs on the lines of communication as better examples of the nature of modern war.

Aufmarsch I Ost became a secondary deployment plan, as it was feared a French invasion force could be too well established to be driven from Germany or at least inflict greater losses on the Germans, if not defeated sooner.

In the late nineteenth century, military thinking remained dominated by the German Wars of Unification —which had been short and decided by great battles of annihilation. To Germany, British involvement in a future war now seemed almost certain.

A n International Security Reader Princeton: The action of the French armies will be developed in two main operations: Only a few years ago, an American historian and, significantly for the further course of the debate he started, former U.

What was The Schlieffen Plan?

The end result of strategic preparation by Moltke and diplomatic overtures by Chancellor Otto von Bismarck was the unification of all the independent German states and the creation of a German Empire under Prussian control.

Those who performed satisfactorily were promoted to the second and then the third year. Inthis was judged impractical because of a lack of manpower and mobile heavy artillery. Railway building reduced the time needed for mobilisation and a "war preparation period" was introduced by the Russians, to provide for mobilisation to begin with a secret order, reducing mobilisation time further.

Goltz maintained the theme in other publications up tonotably in Das Volk in Waffen The People in Arms, and used his position as a corps commander from to to implement his ideas, particularly in improving the training of Reserve officers and creating a unified youth organisation, the Jungdeutschlandbund Young German League to prepare teenagers for military service.

German forces would mass against the French invasion force and defeat it in a counter-offensive, while conducting a conventional defence against the Russians.

In every Prussian tactical manual published after the Franco-Prussian War was written: Only about thirty students passed this extremely difficult test. But this shared enthusiasm is a myth.

Moltke continued to plan to envelop the French near Verdun and the Meuse, rather than an advance towards Paris. In summary, it may be argued that Schlieffen arrived at his strategic views due to a combination of interpretation of earlier theories and strategies; his personal working style and inter-personal relationships; and finally the wider geo-political context in which he had to base his work.

Schlieffen could contemplate leaving only a small force in the east and inwrote War against France which was taken up by his successor, Moltke the Younger and became the concept of the main German war plan from —The Origins of Offense and the Consequences of Counterforce Jack Snyder, Scott D.

Sagan International Security, Volume 11, Number 3, Winterpp. that the Schlieffen Plan almost succeeded, that minor adjustments could The basic idea behind the Schlieffen Plan had nothing to do with the Austrian alliance.

German General Staff

The stratagem. The existence of the Schlieffen plan has been one of the basic assumptions of 20th-century military history. It was the perfect example of the evils of German militarism: aggressive, mechanical, and disdainful of both politics and of public morality.

Posts about Schlieffen Plan written by Mark R. Stoneman. Skip to content. Mark Stoneman. Am I the only one who can get years behind on relevant readings? Silly me let teaching and editing get in the way of basic readings.

Continue reading “Catch-Up Reading and Article Idea. Germany executed the Schlieffen plan. Named for Alfred von Schlieffen, head of the Generalstab from have adopted ideas from the German staff model.

History of Modern US Army The manual adopted the basic five-step analysis associated with the commander™s es. Oct 31,  · The main principles of Schlieffen’s strategic views were as follows: offensive, maneuver, mass, and economy of force, put to use with the aim of outflanking and destroying the enemy forces.

In addition to this, Schlieffen greatly underestimated Clausewitz’s insistence on friction, or the ‘fog of war’. THE SCHLIEFFEN PLAN: CASE HISTORY OF THE RELATION OF MILITARY STRATEGY TO NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY After an analysis of the merits and disadvantages of these two offensive strategies there is a idea on the ground that France had not been consulted in advance.


An analysis of the basic idea behind the schlieffen plan
Rated 4/5 based on 71 review