Besides the war, they were also trying to get America to pay for the soldiers that they were quartering inside of the city. The King sided with the Indians and against the perceived interests of the settlers to improve relations with the natives beneficial to the colonists and also to control many of their affairs.
Now, regarding the Boston Massacre, it should be noted that thanks to a certain influential man - John Adams - that the soldiers on trial were acquitted. Also the Sons of Liberty destroyed British property, like the tea, when it was the colonists that demanded the tea, England was confused, and so were the colonists, why would the have destroyed something they wanted?
At the end of the battle only a mere nine people or so were dead, and some injured. The law of England says that somebody may not be taxed if he or she does not have a voice in government.
Unlock All Answers Now. They should be grateful.
What the colonists want are rights as British citizens. Those acts basically taxed the colonists to death.
They probally thought that England was trying to do something really horrible, when England might have been trying to help. For example, unlike in Europe, there was no powerful Church; personal freedom as it pertained to religion was therefore taken for granted in the colonies.
This is not so, as sheer distance from the Motherland would have made it impossible. England was the mother country and the colonists paid the lowest taxes in the world. Since the colonists saw no way do deal with this massive force their only choices were to give in or go to war. The colonies boycotted too, until war was their only remaining option.
There were also many more colonists than there were British, and so the British soldiers saw they were outnumbered, fired in self defense.
Like on the Battle of Long Island, where the only good choice, and smart choice left was to retreat and escape. But why should we stay with Great Britain making unnecessary laws that are making the colonists go bankrupt? As such, I negate the resolution.
The Americans, not liking the idea of them making the decisions of their country, decided to protest the soldiers and protest the tariffs. The Parliament basically subjected a law that was an addition to the Molasses Act and said that there was a tax on all sugar that was purchased.
Being that the colonists benefited from the French and Indian war, colonial help in paying back the debt was expected. However, John Adams rightfully points out that if the soldiers had truly meant to do any harm, they would have and could have killed a lot more than a handful of people.
Moreover, even if representatives were sent to Parliament, there would have been about total representing the colonies. The colonies desperate struggles to avoid war failed when England rejected all their petitions and refused to listen to protests.
The colonists thought they were still British, and thus had a voice in British Parliament. Previous to the Boston Massacre and all of the wood for the rebellious fire, there were a few acts.The Colonists were justified in breaking away because the parliament passed laws that were unjustified, The British king was of tyranny, The Stamp Act ofThe Townshend Act and The Boston Massacre.
All of this lead to the colonies joining together and rebelling against the British. “Were the American colonists justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain” The colonists were in every right, aspect and mind, not only justified but also it was about time that they stood of and actually take action against the British.
The Colonists were justified in breaking away because the parliament passed laws that were unjustified, The British king was of tyranny, The Stamp Act ofThe Townshend Act and The Boston Massacre. All of this lead to the colonies joining together and rebelling against the British.
The colonists despised the unlimited power of the. Mar 23, · The 13 Colonies: Was the Declaration of Independence Justified? Updated on June 13, Laura Writes.
The Declaration of Independence. Source. Despite England’s reasons as to why the 13 colonies were wrong to declare war, the colonists were justified in waging war. The colonists in the Declaration of Reviews: The colonists were justified in revolting against the british.
If the colonists wanted to revolt that was their choice. The british were unlawfully taxing the colonists. I think it is safe to say that the colonists had every right to rebel. Their rebellion was based on the simple fact that they had been denied their .Download